San Francisco Giants reportedly preparing to sell at the trade deadline
Per the MLB Trade Rumors Podcast, the Giants are reportedly preparing to sell at the deadline, sitting 65-97 and eliminated from both the division and Wild Card races.

The San Francisco Giants are reportedly preparing to sell at the trade deadline, per the MLB Trade Rumors Podcast hosted by Darragh McDonald and featuring Steve Adams of MLB Trade Rumors.
What happened
The Giants' reported organizational posture heading into the deadline was among the topics addressed on the latest episode of the MLB Trade Rumors Podcast, available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and wherever podcasts are distributed. McDonald and Adams took up the Giants' situation beginning at the 2:35 mark, framing it as a club moving toward selling assets rather than acquiring them.
This is a podcast discussion of a reported directional stance, not a club announcement. San Francisco has not publicly declared any intention to sell. What McDonald and Adams characterize is a team reportedly heading that way — and the standings, as standings tend to do, provide a fairly persuasive backdrop for that framing.
Why it matters
There is a version of this story where the numbers do the talking and the front office simply nods along. The Giants are 65-97, sit fourth in the NL West, and trail the division leader by 35 games. They have been eliminated from both the division race and the Wild Card race. In the National League Wild Card standings, San Francisco ranks 11th, sitting 23.0 games relative to the cut line.
That is not a team on the bubble. That is a team for whom the trade deadline functions less as a roster-construction moment and more as an asset-management exercise. When a club has been eliminated from both the division and Wild Card races, the deadline conversation shifts from "what do we need?" to "what do we have that someone else needs?" — and reportedly, per the podcast, San Francisco's front office has arrived at a similar conclusion.
The broader deadline landscape sketched in the same episode is worth noting for context. McDonald and Adams also discuss teams like the White Sox, Cardinals, and Nationals — clubs described as "sort of rebuilding but keep winning" — and how those organizations should approach the deadline. The Giants, by contrast, do not appear to occupy that ambiguous middle ground. A 65-97 record has a way of resolving ambiguity.
The numbers
The season line tells the story plainly. At 65-97 (.401), San Francisco holds fourth place in the NL West, 35 games behind the division leader. In the Wild Card picture, the Giants rank 11th in the National League, 23.0 games relative to the cut line — a margin that, in practical terms, means the postseason conversation in San Francisco has already moved on to future planning.
The club has also dropped five consecutive games entering this stretch, arriving in Atlanta carrying a five-game losing streak. The combination of a .401 winning percentage, a 35-game deficit, and an active skid does not leave much room for a counter-narrative to the sell reports.
Where the club stands
The Giants are currently on the road in Atlanta for a series at Truist Park. On Wednesday, June 17, the club is scheduled for two games against the Braves — Adrian Houser is the probable starter for one, with Carson Whisenhunt lined up for the other, opposing Grant Holmes and JR Ritchie respectively. On Thursday, June 18, Landen Roupp is the probable starter against Martín Pérez.
A road series in Atlanta, mid-June, with a 65-97 record and a five-game losing streak: the schedule is not doing San Francisco any favors in terms of building a case against the sell reports. Whether the front office is watching these games as competitive baseball or as extended auditions for players who might interest buyers is, per the podcast, increasingly the latter.
The Giants are eliminated from the division race and eliminated from the Wild Card race. In terms of where a club stands relative to the deadline decision, that is about as resolved as a standing can get.
What we don't know yet
The podcast characterizes the Giants as reportedly preparing to sell, but the specifics of that preparation — which players might be available, what the club is seeking in return, which conversations have begun — are not detailed in the available material. This is a directional signal, not a transaction log.
It is also worth noting what "selling" means operationally in a general sense. A team in sell mode at the deadline is typically moving players with expiring contracts, veterans who do not fit the next competitive window, or controllable assets the organization has decided to monetize. Which of those categories applies to San Francisco's potential movers is not addressed in the podcast discussion as reported.
The episode was also recorded prior to some of the other roster and injury news discussed in the same installment — including items involving the Guardians, Royals, and Tigers — so the Giants segment reflects the information available at the time of recording, not necessarily the most current state of the league around them. That caveat applies to any podcast discussion of a fluid situation, and the Giants' situation, at 65-97, is at least fluid in the sense that the deadline is still approaching.
What to watch
The deadline itself is the obvious marker. Between now and then, the questions worth tracking are whether San Francisco makes any preliminary moves that reinforce the reported sell posture, whether specific names surface in trade speculation, and whether anything in the club's performance over the coming weeks shifts the calculus — though at 35 games back and eliminated from both races, the margin for recalculation is narrow enough to measure with a micrometer.
The podcast discussion, per McDonald and Adams, frames this as a team reportedly preparing to sell — not a team still deliberating. If that framing holds, the relevant news going forward is not whether San Francisco sells, but what moves, and what comes back in return.
The Giants have three games in Atlanta ahead of them. The deadline is on the horizon. And reportedly, per the MLB Trade Rumors Podcast, San Francisco already has a working answer to the only question that matters this time of year.
More on the Giants wire.

Vitello ends Giants season with MLB-record 7th ejection
San Francisco's manager was tossed in the final game of the year, setting a new single-season high for ejections across the majors.

Vitello ends Giants season with MLB-record 7th ejection
San Francisco's manager was tossed in the final game of the year, setting a new single-season ejection high across the majors.

Tony Vitello ejected in Game 162, finishes 2026 with MLB-high 7 ejections
Giants manager Tony Vitello was tossed in the final game of the 2026 season, per MLB.com's Maria Guardado, closing the year with more ejections than any other manager in the majors.

Giants Claim Doval Off Waivers From Pirates
San Francisco reclaims the hard-throwing righty it originally developed, adding him back to the bullpen via waiver claim.

Giants claim Camilo Doval off waivers from Pirates in a reunion with an eye on 2027
San Francisco claimed RHP Camilo Doval off waivers from Pittsburgh, per the club's announcement, with the move widely seen as offseason positioning rather than a 2026 factor.

Giants claim Camilo Doval off waivers, reuniting reliever with San Francisco
San Francisco claimed RHP Camilo Doval off waivers from Pittsburgh, per MLB.com's Maria Guardado, bringing the reliever back to the organization.
